<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="review-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SAPARS</journal-id>
<journal-title>Scientiarum: A Multidisciplinary Journal</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">SAPARS</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">0000-0000</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>BOHR</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54646/SAPARS.2025.13</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>REVIEW</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Enhancing physics education through artificial intelligence tools</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Anbu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff><institution>KM College of Education</institution>, <addr-line>Krishnagiri</addr-line>, <country>India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: K. Anbu, <email>anbu.adpc@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>1</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>13</fpage>
<lpage>15</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>05</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2025 Anbu.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Anbu</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>&#x00A9; The Author(s). 2024 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education has opened new avenues for enhancing the teaching-learning process, particularly in subjects like physics, which often involve complex concepts and abstract reasoning. This research explores the application of AI tools in the domain of physics education and evaluates their effectiveness in improving student engagement, conceptual understanding, and performance outcomes. As traditional teaching methods frequently struggle to meet the diverse needs of 21st-century learners, AI offers promising alternatives through adaptive learning platforms, intelligent tutoring systems, and interactive simulations. This study investigates ten widely-used AI tools&#x2014;including PhET, Labster, ChatGPT, and Squirrel AI&#x2014;by analyzing their roles in a structured 60-minute virtual physics class model. The methodology includes a mixed-method approach combining pre- and post-test evaluations, student surveys, and teacher interviews across five educational institutions. Quantitative results indicate a significant increase in student scores (average 28% improvement), while qualitative feedback highlights increased motivation, self-paced learning, and better concept retention. The research also presents implementation strategies and acknowledges challenges such as digital inequality, high software costs, and the need for teacher training. Despite these hurdles, the findings support the transformative role of AI in modern physics education. The study concludes that a well-integrated AI teaching model can democratize access to quality science education and support deeper cognitive engagement among students.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>AI in education</kwd>
<kwd>physics teaching</kwd>
<kwd>adaptive learning</kwd>
<kwd>simulation tools</kwd>
<kwd>virtual classrooms</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="13"/>
<page-count count="3"/>
<word-count count="1412"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Physics is a cornerstone of scientific education, offering insights into the fundamental principles that govern the natural world. Despite its significance, many students perceive physics as difficult due to its abstract concepts, mathematical modeling, and limited opportunities for practical application in traditional classroom settings. Teachers, too, often face challenges in addressing diverse learning needs and engaging students meaningfully. In this context, Artificial Intelligence (AI) emerges as a powerful educational tool capable of bridging instructional gaps and enhancing the overall learning experience.</p>
<p>AI in education refers to systems that can mimic human intelligence to personalize instruction, offer real-time feedback, and simulate complex processes. In physics education, this means students can interact with virtual labs, receive step-by-step explanations, and engage in adaptive learning pathways that respond to their individual progress. With tools like PhET Simulations offering real-time interactivity, Labster enabling 3D virtual experiments, and platforms like ChatGPT providing conversational Q&#x0026;A, physics instruction becomes more dynamic and accessible.</p>
<p>This study explores how the integration of AI tools transforms physics education. The research specifically examines ten AI tools and their applications in a model virtual classroom framework. It evaluates these tools in terms of usability, conceptual clarity, student engagement, and academic outcomes. By analyzing empirical data from five schools, the study provides evidence of the pedagogical benefits of AI-enhanced learning.</p>
<p>The need for innovative teaching strategies in science is more urgent than ever, especially in a post-pandemic world where digital literacy and remote learning have become central. This paper proposes that AI, if implemented thoughtfully and inclusively, can significantly uplift the quality of physics education and empower students to understand and apply scientific knowledge more effectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2">
<title>Literature review</title>
<p>The integration of AI into education has been widely documented:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Luckin et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">1</xref>) describe how AI personalizes instruction based on learner behavior.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Roll and Wylie (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2</xref>) demonstrate improved STEM learning outcomes when AI-driven feedback is used.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Spector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">3</xref>) identifies simulation and intelligent tutoring as key AI-enabled pedagogies in science education.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Zawacki-Richter et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>) highlight increased student engagement through AI-supported blended learning.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>The reviewed literature confirms the potential of AI to resolve conceptual gaps and support self-paced physics learning.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3">
<title>Need for the study</title>
<p>Despite technological advancements, many classrooms lack AI integration due to limited awareness, infrastructure, or empirical data. Physics, being conceptually rigorous, requires new strategies to improve student comprehension and performance. This study addresses the gap by assessing how AI tools affect physics learning outcomes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S4">
<title>Objectives</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To identify relevant AI tools for physics education.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To evaluate their effectiveness in improving learning outcomes.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To design a virtual classroom model using AI integration.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>To analyze students&#x2019; perceptions and performance in AI-enhanced learning environments.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S5">
<title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="S5.SS1">
<title>Research design</title>
<p>Mixed-method (quantitative + qualitative) with an exploratory approach.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5.SS2">
<title>Sample</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Students</bold>: 100 students from five higher secondary schools (Grades 11 &#x0026; 12).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Teachers</bold>: 10 physics teachers across the same institutions.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>AI Tools Tested</bold>: PhET, Squirrel AI, Labster, IBM Watson, Curipod, etc (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Pre- and post-test average scores (out of 100).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">School</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pre-test mean score</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Post-test mean score</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Score improvement (%)</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">School A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">74.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">School B</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">60.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">78.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.4%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">School C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">70.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.8%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">School D</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">63.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">81.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">School E</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">59.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">76.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">27.6%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S5.SS3">
<title>Data collection tools</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Student performance test (pre and post-test)</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Feedback questionnaire (Likert scale)</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Classroom observation and interviews</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S5.SS4">
<title>AI tool selection criteria</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Accessibility and user interface</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Curriculum alignment</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Support for simulations and conceptual scaffolding</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Analytics capability</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S6">
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p><bold>Observation</bold>: Across all institutions, average scores increased by &#x223C;28%, confirming effectiveness of AI tool integration.</p>
<p><bold>Interpretation</bold>: Over 80% of students found AI tools beneficial in improving their understanding and interest in physics (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Student feedback on AI tools (<italic>N</italic> = 100).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Statement</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Strongly agree</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Agree</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Neutral</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Disagree</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Strongly disagree</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AI tools helped me understand difficult concepts in physics.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Simulations made learning more interesting.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">72</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I prefer AI-enhanced classes over traditional ones.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Real-time feedback improved my performance.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Adaptive tools matched my learning pace.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Findings</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>AI tools improve learning outcomes: Average post-test scores increased by 28%.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Simulations were highly effective for visualizing abstract concepts.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Real-time feedback systems promoted self-paced learning.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>High student satisfaction: 90% rated the experience as positive.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p>Teachers observed increased participation and better retention.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S8">
<title>Challenges</title>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Access Gaps</bold>: Not all students had equal device/internet access.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Training Needs</bold>: Teachers required upskilling to use AI tools effectively.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Cost Barrier</bold>: Premium tools like Labster and Squirrel AI may be financially restrictive.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<label>&#x2022;</label>
<p><bold>Data Security</bold>: Concerns around student data usage must be addressed.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>AI-enhanced instruction significantly improves physics teaching by personalizing content, enabling interactive simulations, and offering timely feedback. The integration of tools like PhET, ChatGPT, and Labster can lead to higher student engagement and academic success (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">Table 3</xref>). Future policies should support infrastructure development, teacher training, and cost-effective AI deployment to scale these benefits.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T3">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Effectiveness of each AI tool (based on teacher ratings, scale 1&#x2013;5).</p></caption>
<table cellspacing="5" cellpadding="5" frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AI tool</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ease of use</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Conceptual clarity</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Student engagement</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Overall impact</td>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PhET</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Labster</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">ChatGPT</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Curipod</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">IBM Watson</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Squirrel AI</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<attrib><bold>Note</bold>: Tools with simulation capabilities (PhET, Labster) ranked highest in overall impact. </attrib>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Luckin</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name> <name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>W</given-names></name> <name><surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forcier</surname> <given-names>LB</given-names></name></person-group>. <source><italic>Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education</italic></source>. <publisher-name>Pearson</publisher-name> (<year>2016</year>). Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf">https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intelligence-Unleashed-Publication.pdf</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Roll</surname> <given-names>I</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wylie</surname> <given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education</article-title>. <source><italic>Int J Artif Intell Educ.</italic></source> (<year>2016</year>) <volume>26</volume>:<fpage>582</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Spector</surname> <given-names>JM</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments</article-title>. <source><italic>Interact Learn Environ.</italic></source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>1</volume>:<fpage>2</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zawacki-Richter</surname> <given-names>O</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mar&#x00ED;n</surname> <given-names>VI</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bond</surname> <given-names>M</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gouverneur</surname> <given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education</article-title>. <source><italic>Int J Educ Technol High Educ.</italic></source> (<year>2019</year>) <volume>16</volume>:<fpage>39</fpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<ref-list>
<title>Further reading</title>
<ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Colorado PhET Simulations</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://phet.colorado.edu">https://phet.colorado.edu</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Labster</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.labster.com">https://www.labster.com</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Squirrel</surname> <given-names>AI</given-names></name></person-group>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://squirrelai.com">https://squirrelai.com</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>IBM Watson</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.ibm.com/watson">https://www.ibm.com/watson</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Curipod</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://curipod.com">https://curipod.com</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>ChatGPT</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://openai.com/chatgpt">https://openai.com/chatgpt</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Carnegie Learning</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.carnegielearning.com">https://www.carnegielearning.com</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Knewton Alta</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.wiley.com/education/alta">https://www.wiley.com/education/alta</ext-link></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><citation citation-type="journal"><collab>Socratic</collab>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://socratic.org">https://socratic.org</ext-link></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
